Apple introduced newborn in-app subscription policies that hit caused quite a impress in the playing world. We questioned whether the newborn model module succeed or fail, but at the end of the day consumers module decide. New rivalry is coming from Google’s One Pass that module undercut Apple’s 70/30 income split.
John Gruber from Daring Fireball breaks down the mass arguments against Apple’s newborn policies:
Apple should be attractive less, perhaps farther less, than 30 percent.
Apple should not order subscription-based apps to ingest the in-app subscription APIs. If it’s a good deal for publishers, they’ll opt to ingest the system on their own.
Apple should not order price-matching from subscription offers outside the app. Publishers should be allowed to calculate iOS users more money to counterbalance Apple’s cut.
Apple should study playing models that only can’t give a 70/30 income split.
Gruber makes some engrossing points, and compares the App Store to a shopping mall:
…Apple sees the whole App Store, along with all native iOS apps, as an upscale, premium code store: owned, controlled, and managed like a physical shopping mall. Brick and howitzer retailers don’t resolve for a single-digit revilement of retail prices; neither does the App Store.
It’s artist Gruber, and an engrossing feature nonetheless. Check it discover here.
Gruber’s Take on Apple’s In-App Subscription Policies is a post from: iPhone in Canada Blog - Canada's #1 iPhone Resource
By Find Store Sales
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น